A. Coello/A. Tapia vs M. Arce Simo/P. Lijo Santos
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: Market prices indicate no value: the away odds of 11.0 imply ~9.1% but our conservative true probability estimate (~6%) yields negative EV, so we recommend no bet.
Highlights
- • Book-implied away probability: ~9.09%
- • Our estimated away probability: 6.0% → requires ~16.667 odds to be profitable
Pros
- + Market reflects a clear heavy favorite which likely accounts for strength/experience on clay
- + Low informational edge given lack of additional form/injury/H2H data
Cons
- - If hidden factors exist (injury to a favorite, last-minute withdrawal), market could move and create value
- - Underdog payout looks large but is insufficient relative to our probability estimate
Details
We compare the market prices (home 1.03, away 11.0) to our assessment. The book implies the away pair's chance at ~9.09% (1/11). Given the information available (clay surface, no injury/form data provided, and a very lopsided market), we estimate the away pair's true win probability at about 6.0%. At that probability the required fair decimal price would be ~16.667 to break even, so the current 11.0 is substantially below our required threshold and offers negative expected value. The home side is understandably heavily favored, and the market pricing appears efficient enough that we cannot find positive EV on either side with the available data.
Key factors
- • Extremely lopsided market price (home 1.03 vs away 11.0)
- • Surface is clay — no additional data indicating advantage for underdog
- • No injuries, form, or H2H details provided to justify higher true probability for the away side