MaxBetto
< Back

Ana Vilcek vs Gabriela Skrabalova

Tennis
2025-09-12 12:21
Start: 2025-09-12 12:13

Summary

No pick
EV: 0

Current Odds

Home 16|Away 1.01
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Ana Vilcek_Gabriela Skrabalova_2025-09-12

Analysis

Summary: No value: the favorite is priced too short at 1.23 relative to our conservative 78% win estimate, and the underdog would need much longer odds to be attractive.

Highlights

  • Market implied: Skrabalova ~81.3%, Vilcek ~26.3%
  • Our conservative estimate: Skrabalova 78% → required min odds 1.282; current 1.23 is negative EV

Pros

  • + Clear decision due to large discrepancy between required and offered odds
  • + Conservative approach reduces chance of overbetting on thin information

Cons

  • - High uncertainty because no match-specific data (form, surface, injuries) is available
  • - If inside information exists or our probability is too conservative, value could be misjudged

Details

We have no external research available, so we apply a conservative, market-aware assessment. Market-implied probabilities are: Ana Vilcek (home) 1/3.8 = 26.3% and Gabriela Skrabalova (away) 1/1.23 = 81.3%. Conservatively we estimate Skrabalova's true win probability at 78% (0.78) given the strong market favorite status but allowing a small margin for market margin/overround and unknown info. At that estimate the minimum fair decimal price for Skrabalova is 1.282; the current price of 1.23 is too short and yields negative expected value (EV = 0.78*1.23 - 1 = -0.041, about -4.1% ROI). For Vilcek the fair price would be 4.545 based on our 22% estimate; current 3.8 is also too short and yields about -16.4% ROI. Neither side offers positive EV at the quoted odds, so we recommend no bet.

Key factors

  • No independent research available; using conservative priors
  • Market implies a heavy favorite (Skrabalova) at 81.3% implied probability
  • We estimate Skrabalova win probability slightly lower at 78%, still below the implied market edge
  • Neither side meets the value threshold at the quoted decimal prices