MaxBetto
< Back

Aneta Kucmova vs Hanne Vandewinkel

Tennis
2025-09-08 22:09
Start: 2025-09-09 10:00

Summary

Pick: home
EV: 0.156

Current Odds

Home 2.98|Away 1.4
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Aneta Kucmova_Hanne Vandewinkel_2025-09-09

Analysis

Summary: We find value on Aneta Kucmova at 2.89 because the market overprices Vandewinkel relative to her documented win rate and recent form; our conservative true win probability for Aneta is 40%, giving ~15.6% ROI at current odds.

Highlights

  • Market-implied home probability 34.6% vs our estimate 40%
  • Positive EV of ~0.156 (15.6% ROI) at current decimal odds 2.89

Pros

  • + Large gap between our estimated probability and market-implied probability
  • + Opponent (Vandewinkel) shows weak recent results and low career win rate

Cons

  • - Very limited data on Aneta Kucmova in the provided research increases uncertainty
  • - Surface, injuries, and further match context are unknown and could negate perceived value

Details

We identify value on the home price (Aneta Kucmova at 2.89) because the market-implied probability (≈34.6%) appears too low relative to a conservative assessment of this matchup. The only available player-specific research shows Hanne Vandewinkel with a 10-22 career record (≈31% win rate) and recent losses, which suggests she is not a dominant baseline favorite despite the 1.42 moneyline. With no published negative information on Aneta in the provided research, the market appears to favor Vandewinkel more than the head-to-head evidence justifies. Comparing probabilities: implied home win probability = 1/2.89 = 0.346, our estimated true probability = 0.40, which yields positive expected value (EV = 0.40*2.89 - 1 ≈ 0.156). We therefore recommend the home side at current prices but flag significant uncertainty due to limited data on the home player and unknown surface/conditions.

Key factors

  • Hanne Vandewinkel career record 10-22 (≈31% win rate) and recent losses
  • Market implies Vandewinkel ~70% chance at 1.42, which looks overstated given her form
  • No research provided on Aneta Kucmova, suggesting possible market undervaluation or information gap