MaxBetto
< Back

Ayla Aksu vs Alina Korneeva

Tennis
2025-09-09 02:17
Start: 2025-09-10 09:00

Summary

Pick: home
EV: 0.194

Current Odds

Home 4.48|Away 1.181
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Ayla Aksu_Alina Korneeva_2025-09-10

Analysis

Summary: We find value on Ayla Aksu at 3.98 given a conservative 30% win estimate; the market overprices the favorite in a variance-prone ITF match, yielding ~19% ROI by our estimate.

Highlights

  • Home (Ayla Aksu) estimated win probability 30% vs market-implied ~17%
  • Current decimal 3.98 yields positive EV (≈+0.194) under our estimate

Pros

  • + Large price discrepancy vs conservative true probability produces positive EV
  • + ITF matches are volatile—underdog upsets are common enough to create value

Cons

  • - Research lacks clear H2H, ranking and up-to-date injury/form details, increasing uncertainty
  • - If Korneeva is indeed a strong favorite (close to market-implied probability), this bet would be losing

Details

The market price makes Alina Korneeva an ~83% favorite (1.201 decimal), which implies Ayla Aksu has only ~17% chance. The available player profiles show both players with extensive match histories and clay experience but do not present clear evidence that Korneeva is an 83%+ certainty in an ITF match; recent snippets indicate both have mixed recent results. We view the market as overpricing the favorite in a lower-tier ITF event where variance, form swings and veteran experience matter. Conservatively estimating Ayla Aksu's true win probability at 30% versus the market-implied ~17% produces positive expected value at the quoted home price (3.98). At that estimate EV = 0.30 * 3.98 - 1 = +0.194 (19.4% ROI). We recognize uncertainty in the research (no clear injury or H2H data), so this is a value-seeking play based on market overreaction to a short price rather than strong evidence that Aksu is the likely winner.

Key factors

  • Market-implied probability for Korneeva is extremely high (~83%), leaving room for value if true edge exists
  • Both players have clay experience and long careers per profiles; lack of decisive recent-form advantage in the provided research
  • ITF-level matches have higher variance and potential for favorites to be upset, improving underdog value