C. Bittoun Kouzmine/J. Seeman vs S. Callejon Hernando/J. Echeverria
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: No value identified at current prices; the away price (11.0) is too short relative to our conservative 6% win estimate, producing negative EV.
Highlights
- • Away implied probability: 9.09% (11.0); our conservative estimate: 6.0%
- • Break-even odds for away are ~16.667 — far above the current 11.0
Pros
- + Market makes the favorite extremely short, limiting meaningful risk-taking
- + Conservative approach prevents taking likely negative-EV action when information is absent
Cons
- - If there are unseen factors (late withdrawal, injury, extreme form shift) the market could misprice value
- - Opportunity cost if our probability estimate underestimates an upset scenario
Details
With no external research and only the quoted prices available, we take a conservative view. The market prices the home pair as overwhelming favorites (home 1.04 implies ~96.2%); the away side at 11.0 implies ~9.09%. Given the lack of form, surface, injury, or H2H data and the typical low informational edge in this situation, we estimate the true probability of the away pair winning at 6.0% (0.06), below the market-implied 9.09%. At the current away price (11.0) this yields a negative expected value (EV = 0.06*11 - 1 = -0.34), so there is no value to take on either side. To consider a speculative bet on the away team we would require decimal odds of at least 16.667 to reach break-even.
Key factors
- • No external data on form, surface, injuries, or H2H — we assume high uncertainty
- • Market implies a very low probability for the away pair (9.09%); our conservative estimate is lower (6%)
- • Required odds for positive EV on the away side are materially higher (≈16.667) than offered (11.0)