C. Corte/D. Grigore vs D. Bredberg Canizares/M. Sawant
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: Current odds do not offer value: the favorite at 1.15 is overpriced relative to our 80% win estimate, producing a negative EV; we recommend no bet.
Highlights
- • Favorite implied probability (86.96%) exceeds our estimated true probability (80%)
- • Break-even price for our estimate is 1.25, above the offered 1.15
Pros
- + Market consensus likely reflects perceived skill gap, reducing surprise variance risk
- + Clay surface known, so no venue uncertainty from available research
Cons
- - Lack of detailed form, injury, and H2H data increases forecasting uncertainty
- - High favorite price leaves little room for market mispricing — negative EV at current quote
Details
The market prices make the away pair a very strong favorite at 1.15 (implied ~86.96%). Given only the surface (outdoor clay) and no additional injury, form, or H2H data, we conservatively estimate the favorite's true win probability at 80%. That implies a fair decimal price of 1.25, while the market price of 1.15 overstates the favorite's win chance. Expected value at the current favorite price is negative (EV = 0.80 * 1.15 - 1 = -0.08), so there is no value on the favorite. The long home price (5.10) would require a true win probability >19.61% to be profitable; without evidence to support a >19.6% chance for the underdog on clay, we do not see reliable value on the home side either. Therefore we recommend no bet at the current prices.
Key factors
- • Market heavily favors the away pair at 1.15 (implied ~86.96%)
- • Only confirmed context is outdoor clay; no injury, form, or H2H data available
- • Doubles matches can be more volatile, increasing uncertainty vs. tight implied pricing