Cezar Cretu vs Emilien Demanet
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: No value at current prices — the market overprices Cretu on a surface where both lack demonstrated form; we would need odds ≥ 1.587 on Cretu to consider a value bet.
Highlights
- • Market-implied home win ~71.4% vs our estimated ~63.0%
- • Negative EV on the favorite at current odds (EV ≈ -0.118)
Pros
- + Cretu shows a stronger overall record this season
- + Home is the market favorite, reflecting perceived edge
Cons
- - Neither player has recorded grass results in the provided profiles — surface risk is high
- - Current favorite price (1.40) does not offer positive expected value
Details
We estimate Cezar Cretu is the stronger player overall based on season win rates (Cretu 43-25 vs Demanet 37-26) and marginally better recent form, but both profiles show recent activity on clay and no grass history, creating meaningful uncertainty on a grass surface. The market price (home 1.40) implies a win probability of ~71.4%, while our assessed true probability for Cretu is ~63.0% (we account for career win rates, recent form, and the lack of grass data). At the current home price (decimal 1.40) the expected value is negative: EV = 0.63 * 1.40 - 1 = -0.118, so this price does not offer value. For value on Cretu we would need decimal odds ≥ 1.587. Given the uncertainty around surface and absence of head-to-head data, we do not see value on the underdog either at 2.98 (implied ~33.6%) versus our away win probability estimate of ~37.0% — that would produce minimal/uncertain positive EV and is not compelling versus the risk. Therefore we recommend no bet at current prices.
Key factors
- • Both players' recent matches and listed surfaces are clay/hard; no grass history increases outcome uncertainty
- • Cretu has a slightly better season win-rate and recent form on paper, but not on grass
- • Market heavily favors the home player (1.40) producing an implied probability well above our estimate