MaxBetto
< Back

Cezar Cretu vs Emilien Demanet

Tennis
2025-09-09 22:27
Start: 2025-09-10 10:00

Summary

No pick
EV: 0

Current Odds

Home 1.405|Away 3
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Cezar Cretu_Emilien Demanet_2025-09-10

Analysis

Summary: No value at current prices — the market overprices Cretu on a surface where both lack demonstrated form; we would need odds ≥ 1.587 on Cretu to consider a value bet.

Highlights

  • Market-implied home win ~71.4% vs our estimated ~63.0%
  • Negative EV on the favorite at current odds (EV ≈ -0.118)

Pros

  • + Cretu shows a stronger overall record this season
  • + Home is the market favorite, reflecting perceived edge

Cons

  • - Neither player has recorded grass results in the provided profiles — surface risk is high
  • - Current favorite price (1.40) does not offer positive expected value

Details

We estimate Cezar Cretu is the stronger player overall based on season win rates (Cretu 43-25 vs Demanet 37-26) and marginally better recent form, but both profiles show recent activity on clay and no grass history, creating meaningful uncertainty on a grass surface. The market price (home 1.40) implies a win probability of ~71.4%, while our assessed true probability for Cretu is ~63.0% (we account for career win rates, recent form, and the lack of grass data). At the current home price (decimal 1.40) the expected value is negative: EV = 0.63 * 1.40 - 1 = -0.118, so this price does not offer value. For value on Cretu we would need decimal odds ≥ 1.587. Given the uncertainty around surface and absence of head-to-head data, we do not see value on the underdog either at 2.98 (implied ~33.6%) versus our away win probability estimate of ~37.0% — that would produce minimal/uncertain positive EV and is not compelling versus the risk. Therefore we recommend no bet at current prices.

Key factors

  • Both players' recent matches and listed surfaces are clay/hard; no grass history increases outcome uncertainty
  • Cretu has a slightly better season win-rate and recent form on paper, but not on grass
  • Market heavily favors the home player (1.40) producing an implied probability well above our estimate