MaxBetto
< Back

Charles Broom vs Yusuke Kusuhara

Tennis
2025-09-11 01:17
Start: 2025-09-11 01:00

Summary

No pick
EV: -0.348

Current Odds

Home 1.55|Away 33.07
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Charles Broom_Yusuke Kusuhara_2025-09-11

Analysis

Summary: The market strongly favors Charles Broom, but the available profiles do not support a >90% true win probability; no value exists at the current prices.

Highlights

  • Market-implied probability for Broom far exceeds what match data suggests
  • Break-even odds for our estimated probability would be ~1.667; current price 1.087 is too short

Pros

  • + Broom has more match volume and experience across hard and grass
  • + Both players have recent activity (not clearly rusted/injured in the provided data)

Cons

  • - Available win-rate data does not support a >90% true probability for Broom
  • - No head-to-head, ranking, or injury details in the research to justify the market margin

Details

We compare the market price (Charles Broom 1.087 -> implied ~92.0% win chance) to the evidence in the available profiles. Both players have similar career win rates on hard (Charles Broom ~55.8% overall with hard surface experience; Yusuke Kusuhara ~57.6% overall and plays hard), and recent results shown are mixed for each. There is no head-to-head or injury information in the provided research that justifies a >90% true probability for Broom. Using a conservative model-based estimate of Broom's true win probability (~60%), the market price of 1.087 is deeply over-priced against that estimate (1/0.60 = 1.667 required decimal odds to break even). At the current quoted odds, the expected ROI is strongly negative, so we do not recommend betting either side — there is no value at the listed prices.

Key factors

  • Market implies ~92% for Broom (1.087) which is not supported by similar win rates in the profiles
  • Both players have hard‑court experience; no clear performance edge in the provided data
  • No injuries, H2H, or tournament-seed information in the research to justify the market skew