Claudia Ferrer Perez vs Didi Bredberg Canizares
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: We detect a very small positive expected value backing the heavy favourite (home) at 1.027 based on a conservative 98% win probability, but the edge is tiny and event uncertainty is high.
Highlights
- • Home implied probability from odds: ~97.4%; our conservative estimate: 98.0%
- • Estimated EV is small (~0.65% ROI) at current price 1.027
Pros
- + Current price slightly exceeds our conservative fair price (1.027 > 1.020)
- + Low structural volatility expected if favourite is fit and turns up
Cons
- - Edge is very small — easily erased by late information, scratches, or market moves
- - Lack of external data increases model risk; tiny-priced markets can be unreliable
Details
We compared the market prices (Home 1.027, Away 28.48) to a conservative estimate of the true win probability. The market implies the home player has ~97.37% chance (1/1.027) and the away ~3.51% (1/28.48) — a very short market for the favourite. With no external data available, we make a conservative subjective assessment that the favourite's true win probability is ~98.0% given the extreme price imbalance and typical low-tier mismatch dynamics. At p=0.98 the fair decimal price is 1.020; the current price 1.027 offers a small positive edge. EV = p * odds - 1 = 0.98 * 1.027 - 1 ≈ 0.00646 (≈0.65% ROI). The away side requires a true win probability >3.51% to be profitable; we judge that unlikely. Key risks: no external confirmation of fitness/form, possible late withdrawal, and volatility of tiny-priced markets that can move quickly. On balance we identify a very small, conservative positive EV on the home moneyline at the quoted price.
Key factors
- • Extremely short market price implies overwhelming favourite (book implied ~97.4%)
- • No external data — we apply a conservative subjective true probability (98%)
- • Small book margin and risk of late information (withdrawal/injury) increase uncertainty