D. Brea Senesi/G. Triay Pons vs S. Araujo/A. Ustero Prieto
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: We find small but positive value backing the away pair at 8.5 because we estimate their true win probability (13%) exceeds the market-implied 11.76%, producing ~10.5% EV.
Highlights
- • Away implied prob 11.76% vs our estimate 13% -> positive edge
- • Clay and doubles format increase upset potential relative to single-match assumptions
Pros
- + Current price 8.5 yields a meaningful ROI if our probability estimate is accurate
- + No research notes on injuries or cancellation to materially reduce upset chance
Cons
- - Edge is modest and sensitive to small changes in the win-probability estimate
- - Home is an overwhelming market favorite; if market information we don't have is correct, value evaporates
Details
We compare the market-implied probabilities (home 1.05 -> 95.24%, away 8.5 -> 11.76%) to our assessment. While the market treats the home pairing as near-certain winners, clay doubles and short-match dynamics increase upset potential versus singles lines. We estimate the away pair's true chance at 13.0% (0.13), meaning the current price of 8.5 offers positive value: EV = 0.13 * 8.5 - 1 = 0.105 (10.5% ROI). The margin between the implied probability (11.76%) and our estimate (13.0%) is small but enough to justify a wager at widely available 8.5 odds, given no contrary injury or form information in the research.
Key factors
- • Market implies only 11.76% for the away side at 8.5; we estimate 13.0%
- • Clay surface tends to increase break points and variance compared with faster courts
- • Doubles matches often carry higher upset variance than singles, increasing underdog value
- • No injury or cancellation information in the provided research to materially reduce upset chance