MaxBetto
< Back

Diana-Ioana Simionescu vs Sada Nahimana

Tennis
2025-09-08 22:37
Start: 2025-09-09 07:00

Summary

Pick: home
EV: 0.835

Current Odds

Home 67|Away 1.011
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Diana-Ioana Simionescu_Sada Nahimana_2025-09-09

Analysis

Summary: We find value on the home underdog Diana-Ioana Simionescu: her implied required odds are ~2.381 but the market offers 4.37, producing a large positive expected value using our conservative 42% win estimate.

Highlights

  • Market implies Sada Nahimana win prob ~85% which conflicts with near-identical profiles
  • At our 42% estimate, Simionescu at 4.37 offers ~0.835 EV

Pros

  • + Clear numerical value: available odds (4.37) well above our fair odds (~2.38)
  • + Both players' recent records and surface histories are similar, supporting a higher true chance for the underdog

Cons

  • - Limited data and lack of H2H or injury specifics increase uncertainty
  • - If the market is correctly pricing an unreported factor (fitness, draw, or local conditions), value could evaporate

Details

We see a large market skew toward Sada Nahimana (market-implied ~85.4%) despite both players having essentially identical recorded form (10-22) and similar surface experience on clay and hard. There is no clear injury or form edge in the research that justifies such a heavy favorite. We conservatively estimate Diana-Ioana Simionescu's true chance at 42% based on parity in recent results, potential home/venue familiarity, and the absence of decisive recent wins for Nahimana. At that probability the break-even decimal odds are ~2.381, while the available market price for Simionescu is 4.37 — creating meaningful value. Using the quoted price (4.37) gives EV = 0.42 * 4.37 - 1 = 0.835 (83.5% ROI on a 1-unit stake), so we recommend backing the home underdog because the market appears to overprice the away player.

Key factors

  • Both players show near-identical career records (10-22) and similar surface experience
  • Market heavily favors the away player (implied ~85%) with no clear justification in the provided research
  • Home/venue and parity considerations make the underdog likelier than market implies