E. Grevelius/A. Heinonen vs A. Genov/E. Wallart
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: With no external data and a conservative true probability of 68%, the home price of 1.40 offers negative EV; we recommend no bet unless odds improve to at least 1.471 for the home side.
Highlights
- • Market home implied probability: 71.4% vs our conservative estimate 68.0%
- • Current home odds (1.40) produce ~-4.8% ROI on a 1-unit stake
Pros
- + Home is market favorite, suggesting on-paper advantage
- + Odds are short — low variance if one were confident in the favorite
Cons
- - Insufficient public data (form, injuries, H2H, surface) to justify a higher win probability
- - Estimated true probability is below market-implied level, producing negative EV
Details
We compare the market moneyline (home 1.40 implies 71.4%) to a conservative, data-light estimate. With no research or injury/form data available we apply conservative shrinkage to the market edge: we estimate the home pair's true win probability at 68.0%. At the quoted 1.40 this yields a negative expected value (EV = 0.68 * 1.40 - 1 = -0.048), so the price does not represent value. The away price (2.75) implies ~36.4% and would require an estimated away win probability materially above ~36.4% to be profitable; with no evidence to support that shift we cannot justify betting the underdog either. Therefore we recommend no bet unless improved odds are offered (min required decimal odds for a profitable home bet = 1.471 based on our probability).
Key factors
- • Market implies home win probability of ~71.4%; we apply conservative shrinkage
- • No available research on form, surface suitability, injuries, or H2H to justify moving off market
- • Narrow margin between our estimate and market means small mispricing risk—no positive EV at current prices