Fangran Tian vs Hikaru Sato
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: We recommend betting on Hikaru Sato (away) at 4.20 because we estimate his win probability at 45%, producing ~0.89 units EV versus the market-implied ~23.8%.
Highlights
- • Market implies Sato only ~23.8% chance at 4.20
- • Our conservative estimate of ~45% yields large positive EV (≈0.89)
Pros
- + Large positive expected value at current quoted price
- + Comparable player profiles reduce likelihood of unobserved skill gap
Cons
- - Small sample sizes and sparse match-detail data increase uncertainty
- - Possible home advantage or late developments (not in research) could reduce value
Details
We see both players with nearly identical career records (10-21 across 31 matches) and similar surface exposure (hard and clay), which suggests baseline ability is close. The market strongly favours the home player at 1.20 (implied ~83.3%), but that is inconsistent with on-paper parity and recent form: both players show recent losses and no reported injuries, so a wholesale 80%+ tilt to the home side looks like market compression rather than objective superiority. We conservatively estimate Hikaru Sato's true win probability at 45%, well above the market-implied 23.8% at 4.20. At that estimate EV = 0.45 * 4.2 - 1 = 0.89 units on a 1-unit stake, indicating clear value in the away price. The minimum fair decimal price given our estimate is 2.222 (1/0.45); the current 4.20 is substantially more generous, providing a large margin for error in our probability estimate. Key uncertainties are limited sample sizes and potential home-court effects not detailed in the research; nonetheless, the discrepancy between market-implied and our estimated probability justifies recommending the away side at current prices.
Key factors
- • Nearly identical career records and match counts imply comparable baseline ability
- • Both players have recent losses and no reported injuries — form is similar
- • Bookmaker price heavily favours home (1.20) creating a large implied-probability gap
- • Recent matches for both are on hard courts, so no clear surface edge for the home player