MaxBetto
< Back

Francisco Rocha vs Anas Mazdrashki

Tennis
2025-09-04 07:14
Start: 2025-09-04 10:00

Summary

Pick: home
EV: 0.049

Current Odds

Home 10.5|Away 1.556
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Francisco Rocha_Anas Mazdrashki_2025-09-04

Analysis

Summary: We recommend a value bet on Francisco Rocha at 2.14 — our estimated win probability (49%) exceeds the market-implied 46.7%, producing a ~4.9% edge.

Highlights

  • Market implies ~46.7% for Rocha; we estimate ~49%
  • Rocha's recent clay Challenger win and greater match experience support the higher probability

Pros

  • + Positive expected value at current widely-available odds (2.14)
  • + Rocha's larger match sample and recent clay result reduce volatility risk relative to opponent

Cons

  • - Limited direct H2H and contextual match details in the provided data
  • - Mazdrashki's true form could be understated due to small sample—upside risk to the market favourite

Details

We find value on Francisco Rocha at 2.14. The market-implied probability for Rocha is 1/2.14 = 46.7%, while our read of the provided form and surface data gives Rocha a higher true chance. Rocha has substantially more match experience and a recent clay Challenger win (late August), whereas Anas Mazdrashki has a smaller sample, recent losses on clay in August, and less consistent form. Given both players are clay-capable, Rocha's greater resilience at Challenger level on clay suggests his win probability is around 49%, which exceeds the market's 46.7% and produces a positive expected value. We used the current decimal odds (2.14) to calculate EV (EV = p * odds - 1), yielding an approximate 4.9% ROI on a 1-unit stake. Key uncertainties are small-sample variability for Mazdrashki and limited head-to-head/contextual detail, so this is a measured value play rather than a low-risk certainty.

Key factors

  • Surface: both players have clay experience; Rocha has recent clay Challenger success
  • Form: Rocha recorded a recent clay win; Mazdrashki has multiple recent losses on clay
  • Sample size and experience: Rocha has far more professional matches (114 vs 27), suggesting more stable performance