MaxBetto
< Back

Gala Ivanovic vs Giulia Safina Popa

Tennis
2025-09-11 20:49
Start: 2025-09-12 07:00

Summary

No pick
EV: 0

Current Odds

Home 5.33|Away 1.13
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Gala Ivanovic_Giulia Safina Popa_2025-09-12

Analysis

Summary: Market pricing for Giulia Safina Popa (1.13) appears overconfident relative to the limited form data; we find no positive EV and therefore do not recommend a bet.

Highlights

  • Public price implies ~88.5% chance for Popa
  • Our estimated true probability for Popa is ~65%, producing negative EV at current odds

Pros

  • + Clear explanation why favorite price is unlikely to be justified by available form data
  • + Conservative stance given the lack of opponent information

Cons

  • - Estimate must absorb missing data on Gala Ivanovic and match conditions, increasing uncertainty
  • - If there are unreported factors (injury, withdrawals, large ranking gap) the market price could be correct

Details

We assessed the market price and available player information. The market makes Giulia Safina Popa a very large favorite at 1.13 (implied ~88.5%). Popa's career sample in the research shows a 10-21 record (win rate ~32%) across 31 matches and recent losses on hard courts; there is no head-to-head or concrete information about Gala Ivanovic in the provided material to justify discounting the market that heavily. Even with a generous adjustment for matchup context and Tour progression, we estimate Popa's true win probability materially below the implied 88.5% — we set our working estimate at 65%. At that probability the fair price would be ~1.538; the available 1.13 offers negative expected value (EV = 0.65*1.13 - 1 = -0.266). Because the current moneyline on Popa does not provide positive EV versus our estimate, we do not recommend a side.

Key factors

  • Market implies ~88.5% for Popa (1.13) which is extremely high given available form data
  • Popa's recorded career win rate in the provided data is low (10/31 = ~32%), with recent losses
  • No information on Gala Ivanovic was provided, increasing uncertainty and arguing for caution