MaxBetto
< Back

Giulia Paterno vs Camilla Gennaro

Tennis
2025-09-08 23:41
Start: 2025-09-09 10:00

Summary

Pick: away
EV: 0.098

Current Odds

Home 53.1|Away 1.75
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Giulia Paterno_Camilla Gennaro_2025-09-09

Analysis

Summary: We find value on the away side (Camilla Gennaro) at 1.248 because her experience and body of work justify a higher win probability (~88%) than the market-implied ~80%.

Highlights

  • Gennaro's large career sample materially reduces upset risk
  • Current odds (1.248) are above our fair-price threshold (1.136)

Pros

  • + Clear statistical and experience advantage for Gennaro
  • + Positive expected value at the available odds

Cons

  • - Limited direct recent-form detail for both players in the provided data
  • - Young/inexperienced players can still produce upsets in a single match

Details

We see a clear experience and sample-size edge in favor of Camilla Gennaro: 1066 career matches and a long positive win record versus Giulia Paterno's 31 matches and 10-21 career record. Both players have recent losses listed, but Gennaro's vastly larger body of work and multi-surface experience materially reduce uncertainty. The market price (away 1.248, implied ~80.1%) appears slightly conservative versus our read of Gennaro's true win probability. We estimate Gennaro's true probability at 88%, which yields a positive expected value at the quoted decimal 1.248 (EV = 0.88*1.248 - 1 = +0.098). The minimum fair decimal odds for that probability is 1.136; the current price (1.248) therefore represents value. Key risks are small-sample volatility from Paterno's developing game and the absence of explicit injury/fitness data, but on a pure value basis the away line is attractive.

Key factors

  • Huge experience gap: Gennaro 1066 matches vs Paterno 31 matches
  • Career win-rate and match toughness favor Gennaro (559-507 vs 10-21)
  • Both have recent losses but Gennaro's larger sample reduces variance
  • Current market price (1.248) implies ~80% but we estimate ~88% true