I-Hsuan Cho / Yi Tsen Cho vs Momoko Kobori / Ayano Shimizu
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: We recommend the home doubles pair at 2.24: given the near-identical player profiles and recent form, a 50% true win probability makes 2.24 a positive-EV price.
Highlights
- • Players on both sides show equivalent records and recent surfaces in the provided data
- • Home decimal 2.24 exceeds our required threshold (2.000) for a 50% win probability
Pros
- + Clear value vs. market price based on parity of available player data
- + Price (2.24) converts to a meaningful positive EV at our conservative 50% estimate
Cons
- - Very limited and low-detail research; small-sample career records (31 matches each)
- - No head-to-head, ranking, or injury specifics provided to further support the edge
Details
We find value on the home pairing (I-Hsuan Cho / Yi Tsen Cho). The research shows nearly identical career records and recent form across all four players (each listed at 10-21, with recent matches mainly on hard courts), so there is no clear on-paper advantage for Kobori/Shimizu despite the market pricing them as favorites. The market-implied probability for the away team at decimal 1.667 is ~60.0%, leaving the home side implied at ~44.6% (decimal 2.24). Given parity in records, surfaces played, and absence of differentiating injury or form signals in the provided research, we estimate a closer to 50% true win probability for the home team. At that probability, the current home price (2.24) yields positive expected value (EV = 0.5 * 2.24 - 1 = 0.12), so the home side represents a value bet versus the market price. We note limited sample size and sparse detail, so our probability is conservative and based only on the equivalence of the available player data.
Key factors
- • Both teams' players present nearly identical career records (10-21) and recent results in the provided data
- • Recent matches noted predominantly on hard courts for all four players, reducing surface-based edge
- • Market favors the away pair (implied ~60%) despite lack of differentiating evidence in the research