J. Nicod/J. Sels vs S. Kopp/L. Neumayer
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: With no external data and a conservative true probability of 19% for the home side, the current 5.20 price is marginally too short to be +EV; we recommend no bet.
Highlights
- • Away priced very short at 1.14 (implied ~87.7%)
- • Home implied probability 19.23% versus our conservative estimate of 19.0% — current price falls short of needed 5.263
Pros
- + If the market drifts to 5.30+ for the home side, a small positive EV would appear under our conservative model
- + Conservative approach avoids chasing a heavy favourite where surprise upsets can occur
Cons
- - Large favorite implies limited value on the short side unless we had strong negative info
- - High uncertainty due to lack of form/injury/H2H data increases variance of our estimate
Details
We have no external data for form, surface, injuries, or H2H, so we take a conservative stance. The market prices the away side at 1.14 (implied ~87.7%) and the home side at 5.20 (implied ~19.23%) — a market with a large favorite and visible vig. Given the information vacuum, we conservatively estimate the home pair's true win probability at 19.0%. At that probability the break-even decimal price is 5.263; the available price of 5.20 is slightly short of what we'd require to classify this as +EV. Calculating EV with our conservative estimate: EV = 0.19 * 5.20 - 1 = -0.012 (slightly negative). Therefore there is no value at the current prices and we do not recommend a bet. To consider the underdog, we would need a quote of at least 5.263; any lower price removes value under conservative assumptions.
Key factors
- • No available information on form, surface, injuries, or H2H — we use a conservative probability
- • Market shows a very short-priced favourite (1.14) and a long-priced underdog (5.20) with vig
- • Under our conservative true probability the underdog is slightly underpriced relative to break-even and does not offer +EV at available quotes