MaxBetto
< Back

Jacob Bradshaw vs Samir Hamza Reguig

Tennis
2025-09-06 20:50
Start: 2025-09-07 08:30

Summary

No pick
EV: 0

Current Odds

Home 1.76|Away 2.5
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Jacob Bradshaw_Samir Hamza Reguig_2025-09-07

Analysis

Summary: No value to back either player at current prices: Bradshaw is a reasonable favorite but needs >66.5% true win probability to be +EV at 1.503, which we do not assign.

Highlights

  • Home implied probability (1.503) ≈ 66.5%; our estimate ~60%
  • We therefore decline to recommend a bet — no positive EV at current lines

Pros

  • + Bradshaw has the better recent record and is the logical favorite
  • + Both players have recent hard-court matches in Monastir, reducing surface surprise

Cons

  • - Bradshaw's season record is not dominant (13-15), so the market may be overpricing him
  • - Reguig's higher match count but poor win rate creates unpredictability; data sample remains small

Details

We estimate Jacob Bradshaw is the match favorite but not by as large a margin as the market implies. The current moneyline (home 1.503) implies ~66.5% win probability; based on the players' season records (Bradshaw 13-15, Samir 12-26), both having played Monastir on hard courts recently, and no clear H2H or injury information, we assess Bradshaw's true win probability at about 60%. That is materially below the implied 66.5%, so the home price at 1.503 does not offer positive expected value. Conversely, Reguig's decimal 2.45 implies ~40.8% — our estimate for him is lower (roughly 40% or less), so that side also lacks value. Given limited, mixed-form data and small-sample career records, the market price appears tight but not exploitable for value on either side.

Key factors

  • Bradshaw slightly better win-rate this season (13-15) versus Reguig (12-26)
  • Both players have recent matches at Monastir on hard courts — surface familiarity is similar
  • Small-sample career records and lack of head-to-head or injury info increases uncertainty
  • Market-implied probability for Bradshaw (≈66.5%) exceeds our estimate (60%) so no edge