MaxBetto
< Back

Jana Otzipka vs Anastasia Tikhonova

Tennis
2025-09-03 15:58
Start: 2025-09-03 13:50

Summary

Pick: home
EV: 0.096

Current Odds

Home 48.36|Away 1.02
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Jana Otzipka_Anastasia Tikhonova_2025-09-03

Analysis

Summary: With no external data and elevated ITF variance, we estimate Otzipka's true win probability at 40% which makes the 2.74 quote offer ~9.6% positive EV — we recommend the home underdog.

Highlights

  • Home (Otzipka) estimated true probability: 40%; needed odds ≥ 2.50 for breakeven
  • Current home odds 2.74 produce EV ≈ +0.096 (9.6% ROI) under our conservative model

Pros

  • + Clear positive EV at available market price for the home underdog
  • + Conservative probability estimate reduces risk of overestimating value

Cons

  • - No match-specific information (form, injuries, surface, H2H) increases uncertainty
  • - ITF-level matches are higher variance; outcomes can be more unpredictable

Details

We received no external match-specific data, so we proceed conservatively. The market currently prices Anastasia Tikhonova as a clear favorite at 1.459 (implied win probability ~68.5%) and Jana Otzipka at 2.74 (implied ~36.5%). Given the lack of injury, form, surface, or H2H information, and the higher variance typical of ITF events, we avoid trusting the market's short favorite price fully. We estimate a more balanced true probability of 40.0% for Otzipka and 60.0% for Tikhonova. At Otzipka 2.74 this yields positive expected value: EV = 0.40 * 2.74 - 1 = +0.096 (≈9.6% ROI). The favorite at 1.459 offers negative EV under our estimate (0.60 * 1.459 - 1 = -0.125). Therefore we recommend backing the home underdog (Jana Otzipka) because current decimal odds exceed our minimum fair odds threshold (2.50).

Key factors

  • No match-specific data available — we apply conservative assumptions and higher variance for ITF events
  • Market-implied probabilities: Away 68.5% vs Home 36.5%; we adjust toward a more balanced split due to uncertainty
  • Current home odds (2.74) exceed our fair threshold (2.50), creating positive EV under our estimate