MaxBetto
< Back

K. Ben Abdelhafidh/L. Youssef vs R. Lacasse/N. Verster

Tennis
2025-09-10 14:10
Start: 2025-09-10 14:06

Summary

No pick
EV: -0.0106

Current Odds

Home 17|Away 1.01
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: K. Ben Abdelhafidh/L. Youssef_R. Lacasse/N. Verster_2025-09-10

Analysis

Summary: No value detected: the 1.02 favorite requires an implausibly high true win probability (>98.04%) to be profitable; the 15.0 underdog is priced too generously relative to our conservative upset estimate.

Highlights

  • Away implied probability (1.02) > required threshold for +EV given our conservative estimate
  • Both sides fail to show positive expected value against conservative win-probability estimates

Pros

  • + Market consensus strongly favors the away pair, reflecting a likely genuine skill gap
  • + Betting on the favorite would be low variance if it were value

Cons

  • - Current favorite price (1.02) leaves no margin for error — tiny misestimation flips EV negative
  • - Insufficient match-specific data returned; we must be conservative, reducing chances this is a value wager

Details

The market strongly favors the away pair at 1.02 (implied ~98.04%). With no external data returned and using conservative assumptions, we estimate the away team win probability at 97.0% (0.97). To be +EV at decimal 1.02 the true win probability would need to exceed 98.039% (1 / 1.02). Our estimate is materially below that threshold, producing a small negative expected value. The home price of 15.0 implies a ~6.67% market chance; our conservative assessment of the underdog is well below that (we estimate ~3% for the home pair), so the long shot also lacks value. Given the tiny edge required to profit on the favorite and the lack of corroborating data, we recommend taking no side.

Key factors

  • Market implies away win probability of ~98.04% at 1.02 — very high threshold to beat
  • No external data returned; we use a conservative 97% estimate for the favorite rather than assuming near-certainty
  • Home odds of 15.0 imply only ~6.67% chance; our conservative assessment gives a substantially lower true probability