MaxBetto
< Back

Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez vs Daniel Dutra da Silva

Tennis
2025-09-03 15:57
Start: 2025-09-03 13:00

Summary

No pick
EV: 0

Current Odds

Home 3.3|Away 1.588
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez_Daniel Dutra da Silva_2025-09-03

Analysis

Summary: No value found: the market favorite is priced slightly too short compared with our conservative 60% win estimate, producing a negative expected return, so we do not recommend a bet.

Highlights

  • Away implied probability 62.9% (1.588) vs our estimate 60.0%
  • Required decimal for value on the favorite is ≥ 1.667; current price is 1.588

Pros

  • + Market clearly identifies a favorite, limiting mispricing risk if our conservative view is accurate
  • + If additional positive information on the home player emerges, the away price could become more attractive to trade against

Cons

  • - No match-specific data available (form, surface, injuries, H2H) increases uncertainty
  • - Current prices produce negative ROI under conservative probability estimates

Details

Market prices imply the away (Dutra da Silva) is the clear favorite at decimal 1.588 (implied ~62.9%) while the home (Rodriguez) is priced at 2.35 (implied ~42.6%). With no external form, surface, H2H, or injury information available, we adopt conservative priors and slightly discount the market edge. Our best estimate is that Dutra da Silva has ~60.0% true win probability; at the available price of 1.588 this yields a negative expected return (0.60 * 1.588 - 1 = -0.047). The home player would need a substantially higher true probability (≥42.6%) than we assign to justify backing at 2.35. Given both sides produce negative ROI under our conservative probabilities, we decline to recommend a bet and instead note the minimum price that would create value on the favorite.

Key factors

  • No external data available on recent form, injuries, or surface performance
  • Market-implied probability (away 62.9%) slightly above our conservative true-probability estimate (60%)
  • At current prices both sides produce negative ROI under conservative assumptions