MaxBetto
< Back

Lucija Ciric-Bagaric vs Jule Niemeier

Tennis
2025-09-09 10:02
Start: 2025-09-09 10:00

Summary

Pick: home
EV: 0.12

Current Odds

Home 46|Away -
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Lucija Ciric-Bagaric_Jule Niemeier_2025-09-09

Analysis

Summary: We find value backing Lucija Ciric-Bagaric at 2.80 because the market overstates the away favourite; our estimated win probability (40%) makes 2.80 a positive-EV price.

Highlights

  • Market implies 71% for the away player despite near-identical records
  • At our 40% estimate, the home price 2.80 yields +12% EV

Pros

  • + Current price (2.80) is above our fair threshold (2.50), creating positive expected value
  • + Profiles and recent results do not support a dominant favourite, suggesting upside on home

Cons

  • - High uncertainty from small sample sizes and limited contextual info (surface, conditions, H2H)
  • - If the away player does possess unlisted advantages (fitness, matchup, recent practice form), the pick could lose

Details

We view the market pricing (Away 1.40 implied ~71.4%, Home 2.80 implied ~35.7%) as overstating the away favourite's advantage. Both players show nearly identical career records (10 wins, ~21-22 losses) and similar surface experience (clay, hard) with recent form showing multiple recent challenger losses for each. There are no injury flags or clear head-to-head/data edges in the provided research to justify a ~71% win probability for the away player. Given parity in the profiles and recent results, we estimate Lucija Ciric-Bagaric's chance at ~40%. At that true probability the minimum fair decimal price is 2.50, so the current 2.80 offers positive value. EV calculation: EV = 0.40 * 2.80 - 1 = +0.12 (12% ROI). We prefer the home upset at 2.80 because the market appears to over-weight the away player without supporting performance differentials in the provided data. We note elevated uncertainty due to small samples and limited contextual info, so this is a medium-risk value pick.

Key factors

  • Nearly identical career records (both ~10 wins, 21-22 losses)
  • Both players have recent losing form at challenger level; no clear performance gap
  • Surface exposure is similar (clay and hard) so no surface edge evident
  • Market heavily favours away at 1.40 which implies ~71% — appears excessive given data
  • No injury or H2H information in research to justify the heavy favourite price