Marcel Granollers / Horacio Zeballos vs Joe Salisbury / Neal Skupski
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: No value is present at current prices given limited, non-decisive research and market-implied probabilities near our 50% estimate; we therefore recommend no bet.
Highlights
- • Market-implied probabilities (Home 53.0%, Away 52.6%) are essentially even
- • Required fair odds for a 50% true probability are 2.000 — above current prices
Pros
- + Market is tight; if additional actionable information appears (injury/H2H/form) value could emerge
- + Conservative approach avoids speculative bets when research is insufficient
Cons
- - Current odds do not provide a positive expected value based on our conservative 50% estimate
- - Research lacks recent form and head-to-head data needed to create a confident edge
Details
We find no clear value at the current near-even prices. The market odds (Home 1.885 -> implied 53.04%; Away 1.901 -> implied 52.62%) are essentially balanced and the publicly available research is sparse and not decisive: Marcel Granollers has an extensive career profile but the provided data is dated, while the opponent profiles contain no usable match/form history. With limited surface-specific or injury/H2H information, our conservative estimated true win probability for either side is ~50%. At that probability the fair decimal price is 2.000, meaning the current market prices would deliver a negative expected value for a 1-unit stake (EV ≈ -0.058 using the Home price 1.885). Because we cannot identify a reliable informational edge or positive EV at the quoted prices, we recommend no bet.
Key factors
- • Market prices are nearly even (implied probabilities ~52–53%)
- • Available player data is limited or dated and does not indicate a clear edge
- • On hard courts doubles outcomes often hinge on serve/return form and teamwork, info not present in the research