MaxBetto
< Back

Marina Stakusic vs Amandine Hesse

Tennis
2025-09-06 08:29
Start: 2025-09-06 20:30

Summary

Pick: away
EV: 0.138

Current Odds

Home 1.38|Away 3.2
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Marina Stakusic_Amandine Hesse_2025-09-06

Analysis

Summary: We find value on Amandine Hesse at 2.71 — our estimated win probability (42%) implies positive EV (~13.8% ROI) compared with the market-implied probability (~36.9%).

Highlights

  • Market implies Hesse ~36.9% but we estimate ~42% true chance
  • Minimum fair odds for value on Hesse are ~2.381; current price 2.71 exceeds that

Pros

  • + Underdog price (2.71) offers clear positive EV against our conservative probability
  • + Research shows no clear advantage for the favorite to justify such a short price

Cons

  • - Sample sizes and provided data are limited and similar for both players, increasing uncertainty
  • - Qualifier matches and form volatility make outcomes less predictable — higher variance

Details

We see the market pricing Marina Stakusic as a clear favorite at 1.469 (implied ~68.0%) while Amandine Hesse is available at 2.71 (implied ~36.9%). The limited research shows nearly identical career records and recent form for both players (both 10-21 in the provided span) with no clear injury or surface edge noted, so the market favorite status for Stakusic looks overstated. We estimate Hesse's true chance to win at ~42% based on the parity in records and lack of distinguishing form/injury data; at that probability the away line 2.71 offers positive expected value: EV = 0.42 * 2.71 - 1 ≈ +0.138. The market also contains a small overround (~4.9%), which slightly inflates favorite pricing. Given the available odds, backing the underdog (Hesse) represents value versus our estimated probability, while backing the favorite does not.

Key factors

  • Both players show nearly identical career records and recent form in the provided data
  • Market heavily favors the home player (large margin vs. plausible true edge)
  • No reported injuries or surface advantage in the research to justify the market gap