Marko Topo vs Andrew Paulson
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: We estimate Topo's true win probability at 68% which is lower than the market-implied ~71.4% at 1.40; this produces a small negative EV, so we recommend no bet.
Highlights
- • Current home price 1.40 requires >71.4% true probability to be +EV
- • Our conservative estimate (68%) yields EV = -4.8% at current odds
Pros
- + Market clearly identifies a favorite (Topo) — lower variance outcome
- + If additional positive information on Topo appears (injury-free, strong form), price would need to drift to >=1.471 to be +EV for our view
Cons
- - Insufficient public data increases uncertainty in our probability estimate
- - Small edge threshold — slight information or market shifts could flip EV
Details
We have no external match data and proceed conservatively. The market quotes Marko Topo (home) at 1.40 (implied ~71.4%); to be +EV at that price the true win probability must exceed ~71.4%. Based on a conservative assessment with unknown surface, no injury/form details, and the typical variance in challenger-level events, we estimate Topo's true win probability at 68.0% (0.68). At that estimate the expected value on the 1.40 quote is negative (EV = 0.68 * 1.40 - 1 = -0.048), so there is no value in backing the favorite. To be profitable we would need decimal odds of at least 1.471 for our 68% view. Given the lack of independent data and the market implying a higher probability than our conservative estimate, we recommend no bet.
Key factors
- • No external match/injury/form data available — we use conservative baseline assumptions
- • Market-implied probability for home (1.40) = 71.4% which exceeds our conservative true estimate (68%)
- • Small margin between market and our estimate creates negative EV at available prices