Miriam Bulgaru vs Anna Pircher
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: We find value on Anna Pircher at 3.64 (estimated true win probability ~30%), producing a modest positive EV (~9.2%) despite significant variance and limited public information.
Highlights
- • Market implies Pircher has ~27.5% but we estimate ~30%
- • Positive EV at current odds: ~+0.092 per 1 unit staked
Pros
- + Clear numerical edge vs. market price (required odds 3.333 vs offered 3.64)
- + ITF semifinals often produce higher variance, helping underdogs
Cons
- - Recommendation relies on conservative assumptions because no detailed form/H2H data are available
- - High variance in lower-tier tennis means outcomes are unpredictable even with positive EV
Details
We compare the market prices to our conservative assessment. The market implies Miriam Bulgaru has ~80.2% (1/1.247) and Anna Pircher ~27.5% (1/3.64), with an apparent market margin of ~7.7%. Given the match is an ITF semifinal with higher variance, limited public information, and no reported injuries or conditions to justify such a large favorite margin, we conservatively estimate Pircher's true chance at 30%. At decimal odds 3.64 this gives positive expected value: EV = 0.30 * 3.64 - 1 = +0.092 (9.2% ROI). To be profitable long term we require a true probability above 27.47%; our 30% estimate exceeds that threshold. We therefore recommend backing the away underdog because the market appears to overstate the favorite and underprice the upset potential in this setting. The recommendation is tempered by limited data and high variance in ITF-level matches, so risk remains significant.
Key factors
- • Market-implied probability for favorite is ~80%, leaving the underdog at ~27.5%
- • ITF semifinal context increases upset variance compared with top-level events
- • No specific injuries or contextual info to justify a >80% market probability
- • We apply conservative uplift to the underdog due to uncertainty and variance