MaxBetto
< Back

Momoko Kobori / Ayano Shimizu vs Veronika Erjavec / Zhibek Kulambayeva

Tennis
2025-09-14 02:48
Start: 2025-09-14 07:00

Summary

Pick: home
EV: 0.043

Current Odds

Home 2.41|Away 1.524
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Momoko Kobori / Ayano Shimizu_Veronika Erjavec / Zhibek Kulambayeva_2025-09-14

Analysis

Summary: We see small value on Kobori/Shimizu at 2.37 because the market overstates the away pair; expected ROI is modest (~4.3%) with medium risk due to limited information on doubles pairing form.

Highlights

  • Book market implies away win ~66%, which appears overstated given symmetric profiles
  • Home at 2.37 offers a small positive EV if true win chance ~44%

Pros

  • + Positive expected value at current widely-available price
  • + Decision backed by parity in player records and lack of injury/surface advantage

Cons

  • - Edge is small (≈4.3% ROI) and sensitive to small errors in our probability estimate
  • - Doubles-specific factors (chemistry, recent pairings) are not well-documented and increase uncertainty

Details

The market heavily favors Erjavec/Kulambayeva at 1.515 (implied win prob ~66.0%) while Kobori/Shimizu are priced at 2.37 (implied ~42.2%). The four players' recent profiles show very similar career windows, match counts and losing records with no clear injury or surface advantage for the favorites; form and results are largely symmetric. Given the symmetry, we believe the true win probability for Kobori/Shimizu is higher than the market-implied 42.2% — we estimate ~44.0% — which makes the home price of 2.37 a slight positive EV. At our estimate the expected value is ~+0.043 units per 1-unit stake (4.3% ROI). This is a modest value play driven by the market overpricing the away side, but the margin is small and uncertainty around doubles chemistry and recent form keeps this a medium-risk, small-edge bet.

Key factors

  • Market strongly favors away team (implied 66.0%) creating potential mispricing
  • Player records and recent form are broadly similar across both teams — no clear dominance
  • No reported injuries or surface edge that justify the large market gap