Rose Seccia vs Rachel Krzyzak
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: We do not recommend a wager: the favorite’s price (1.17) does not offer value against our conservative 80% win probability, producing a negative EV.
Highlights
- • Estimated true probability for the favorite: 80% (conservative)
- • Required fair odds for value: >= 1.25; current is 1.17
Pros
- + Market consensus strongly favors the away player, consistent with a high true probability
- + Low variance outcome likely but reward is insufficient at current price
Cons
- - Current favorite price (1.17) is below our minimum fair odds (1.25) — negative EV
- - No corroborating information (form/injury/H2H/surface) available, increasing uncertainty
Details
We compare the market prices (Home 4.70, Away 1.17) to a conservative estimated true probability. The market-implied probability for the away player at 1.17 is about 85.5% (1/1.17) with a visible book overround (~6.8% when summing implied probabilities). With no external form, injury, surface, or H2H data available, we adopt a conservative, market-normalized true probability for the favorite of 80% to avoid overestimating certainty. At our estimated true probability (0.80), the minimum fair decimal odds would be 1.25 (1 / 0.80). The current quoted price of 1.17 is below that threshold and yields a negative expected value (EV = 0.80 * 1.17 - 1 = -0.064). The underdog (home) at 4.70 would require a true probability of ~21.3% to break even; using the market-normalized view the home’s true chance is near 20% and its EV is also marginal/negative. Given the conservative probability estimate and the low return on the heavy favorite after accounting for overround and our uncertainty, we do not find a positive-value bet at current prices.
Key factors
- • Market strongly favors the away player (1.17) with implied probability ~85.5%
- • Visible book overround (~6.8%) makes market slightly expensive for bettors
- • No external data on form, surface, injuries, or H2H — we use conservative, market-normalized estimates