MaxBetto
< Back

S. Jara/M. J. Sanchez Uribe vs A. Abbagnato/S. Dols

Tennis
2025-09-09 18:01
Start: 2025-09-09 17:55

Summary

No pick
EV: -0.046

Current Odds

Home 17|Away 1.01
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: S. Jara/M. J. Sanchez Uribe_A. Abbagnato/S. Dols_2025-09-09

Analysis

Summary: No value detected at current prices: the favorite's price (1.06) offers negative EV against our conservative 90% win probability, and we lack evidence to upgrade the underdog to the required probability for value.

Highlights

  • Favorite implied probability ~94.3%; our conservative estimate 90% — negative EV at 1.06
  • Break-even odds for the favorite given our estimate are ~1.111; current market is shorter

Pros

  • + Market strongly favors the away team, reflecting perceived skill/advantage
  • + Large longshot payout exists if additional information later supports an upset

Cons

  • - Current favorite odds leave no value (very low payout and high implied probability)
  • - No researchable data available to materially adjust probabilities in favor of the underdog

Details

Market prices show a very heavy favorite for A. Abbagnato/S. Dols (1.06 decimal, implied ~94.3%) and a large longshot for S. Jara/M. J. Sanchez Uribe (9.0 decimal, implied ~11.1%). We have no external form, surface, injury, or H2H data to justify deviating from a conservative view. Using a conservative estimated true probability of 90% for the favorite (reflecting uncertainty and the heavy market lean) the favorite is overpriced by the market (EV negative at available prices). To find value on the favorite we would need decimal odds >= 1.111; to find value on the underdog we would need to believe their true win probability is >= 11.11% (which we cannot justify without information). Given the lack of corroborating information and the very small margin available on the favorite, we decline to recommend a side.

Key factors

  • Very short market price on away side (1.06) leaves almost no margin for edge
  • No available data on form, surface, injuries, or H2H — increases uncertainty
  • Longshot payout (9.0) looks attractive mathematically only if true upset probability >11.11%, which we cannot support