S. de la Fuente/L. Falabella vs N. Garcia Longo/T. Martinez
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: Given lack of corroborating data and heavy market favoritism, we estimate the home team's true win chance (~85%) is below the market-implied probability, so there is no value at 1.13.
Highlights
- • Home implied probability: ~88.5% (1.13)
- • Our conservative estimate: 85% → requires ≥1.176 odds for breakeven
Pros
- + Home is heavily favored by the market, implying perceived clear quality edge
- + Upset would be relatively unlikely based on market pricing
Cons
- - No independent data on form, surface, injuries or H2H to justify believing market is an overestimate
- - Very low payout on favorite; even a small overestimation of win probability makes the bet unprofitable
Details
We see the home pair quoted very short at 1.13 (market-implied ~88.5%). No external research returned, so we adopt conservative assumptions: without form, surface, injury, or H2H data we cannot justify a probability higher than the market's implied chance. We estimate the true win probability for the home team at 85.0%, which is below the market-implied ~88.5%, therefore the current price offers negative expected value. To obtain positive EV we would need a minimum decimal price ~1.176 or higher for the home side; at the quoted 1.13 the bet is not profitable.
Key factors
- • Market-implied probability for home at 1.13 is ~88.5%, which is higher than our conservative estimate
- • No returned research on form, surface, injuries, or H2H — increases uncertainty and argues for conservative probability
- • Very low return on favorite at current odds; small upset probability has outsized impact on ROI