MaxBetto
< Back

Tamara Korpatsch vs Alizé Cornet

Tennis
2025-09-08 19:31
Start: 2025-09-09 13:00

Summary

No pick
EV: -0.345

Current Odds

Home 1.26|Away 3.7
Best Odds

Match Info

Match key: Tamara Korpatsch_Alizé Cornet_2025-09-09

Analysis

Summary: We find no value: the market heavily overprices Korpatsch (1.26) relative to our ~52% estimate, so we recommend no bet at current prices.

Highlights

  • Korpatsch career record implies ~52% baseline win probability
  • Current favorite price (1.26) implies ~79% — significantly above our estimate

Pros

  • + Korpatsch has a long-established win record that gives a meaningful baseline estimate
  • + Clear market consensus on favorite simplifies value comparison

Cons

  • - Recent match results indicate declining short-term form, reducing confidence in favorite pick
  • - No substantive research provided on the away player to justify backing the underdog at 3.7

Details

We estimate Tamara Korpatsch's true match-win probability at about 52% based on her long career win-loss baseline (559–507) adjusted slightly downward for clearly poor recent results shown in the research. The current moneyline of 1.26 implies a win probability of ~79.4%, which is far higher than our estimated 52% and therefore offers negative expected value on the favorite. Converting our estimate into EV: EV = p * decimal_odds - 1 = 0.52 * 1.26 - 1 = -0.345 (≈ -34.5% ROI), so the favorite is overpriced. The underdog at 3.7 carries an implied probability of ~27.0%; while that price could offer value if we believed the underdog’s true chance exceeded ~27%, we lack supporting research on the away player to justify a confident probability above that threshold. Given the available data (detailed Korpatsch profile and recent form), we cannot identify a positive EV bet at the quoted prices and therefore recommend no side.

Key factors

  • Korpatsch career win-rate baseline (~52%)
  • Recent form shown in research indicates a string of losses, lowering short-term expectations
  • Market price (1.26) implies ~79% which far exceeds our estimate and produces negative EV