Thomas Giles vs Sergio Alejandro Gonzalez Ibanez
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: With no external information and after removing bookmaker margin, neither side offers positive expected value at current prices; we recommend no bet.
Highlights
- • Market-implied fair probability for away ≈55.3%
- • Away needs ≥1.808 and home needs ≥2.238 to be +EV; current quotes are lower
Pros
- + Clear market favorite (away) with respectable implied win chance
- + We used a conservative, no-vig normalization to avoid overconfidence
Cons
- - No independent match, form or injury data to find an informational edge
- - Both sides are priced below our required thresholds, so betting would be negative EV
Details
We have no external match data, injuries, form, surface or H2H information, so we apply conservative, market-based analysis. The posted decimals imply probabilities of 1/2.08 = 0.4808 (home) and 1/1.68 = 0.5952 (away); the sum (≈1.076) shows a bookmaker margin. Removing the margin proportionally gives estimated fair probabilities of ~44.7% for Thomas Giles and ~55.3% for Sergio Gonzalez. Using our estimated true probability for the market favorite (away) of 0.553, the EV at the quoted away odds (1.68) is 0.553*1.68 - 1 ≈ -0.071 (negative). To be profitable on the away side we would need at least decimal 1.808; for the home side (p ≈ 0.447) we would need ≈2.238. Because both current quotes are below those required fair thresholds, neither side offers positive expected value and we recommend taking no side.
Key factors
- • No independent data on form, surface, injuries or H2H — conservative market-based approach
- • Market implied probabilities adjusted for vig: away ≈55.3%, home ≈44.7%
- • Current away odds (1.68) are below our fair threshold (≈1.808); current home odds (2.08) are below its threshold (≈2.238)