Vitaliy Sachko vs Thiago Agustin Tirante
Summary
Match Info
Analysis
Summary: No value detected: current prices favor Tirante and our conservative true probability estimate does not find a positive-expected-value bet on either player.
Highlights
- • Tirante is the clear market favorite at 1.373 but our estimated win chance (70%) is slightly below implied probability.
- • Sachko's price (3.19) would need to be ≤3.03 to show value given conservative probability assumptions; current quote is marginally longer but not convincingly supported by data.
Pros
- + Market pricing is clear and reflects Tirante's slight edge based on available records.
- + No injury or external factor in the research forces a sharp deviation from market probabilities.
Cons
- - Research lacks head-to-head and detailed grass-form metrics to identify a reliable underdog edge.
- - Small differences in estimated probabilities create marginal EV, making any bet speculative.
Details
We see Thiago Agustin Tirante as the market favorite at 1.373 (implied ~72.8%) and Vitaliy Sachko as the long shot at 3.19 (implied ~31.3%). Based on the available profiles both players have comparable Challenger-level experience and grass exposure, with Tirante having a slightly better aggregate win record. With limited recent form detail and no clear injury or grass-specific advantage for Sachko in the provided research, our assessment gives Tirante a true win probability of ~70.0% (slightly below the market-implied 72.8%), which produces a negative expected value at the quoted 1.373 price. Conversely, assigning Sachko a higher true probability sufficient to justify the 3.19 price is not supported by the available data. Therefore neither side offers demonstrable positive EV at current widely-available prices and we recommend no bet.
Key factors
- • Market strongly favors Tirante (implied probability ~72.8%)
- • Both players have Challenger-level experience and grass exposure; no clear surface edge in provided data
- • Available win-loss records are similar; no injury or H2H info to justify diverging from market